Concerts. Big concerts—arena size. I often hear and read how potential audiences, if they’re not going to theater, are going to arena-size, celebrity-driven concerts. And if they’re not at a big concert, they’re at home watching American Idol or Lost. None of this is true.
Sure, every week tens of millions are streaming Netflix, watching TV, and attending concerts in thousand-plus-seat venues. But the potential audience for your theater barely overlaps with these millions.
The ones watching TV and Netflix like to be at home. They get their energy from being at home. They may love drama, actors, rapid-fire dialogue, costumes, and spectacle, but they’ve created a home for themselves, a nest, and they want to stay in it. They are mostly content get their culture there. They would have to become a different person to change their habits. Friends, lovers, and family may get them out the door, but for them, the best option for an evening does not involve people outside their home, and does not involve leaving their home. So they’re not there, whatever you do.
The ones at arena concerts take their cues from mass culture. A play that overlaps with that, an actor or an adaptation of something familiar, can draw them in. But they are not going to change. They aren’t going to smell the sizzle of something that isn’t already legitimized nationally, on a daily basis. They aren’t at a Coldplay show because Coldplay is the best rock band in the world. They’re at a Coldplay show because, of the bands that are legitimized through mass promotion, they like them. Unless a theater company is going to join that mass media, their work, whatever the subject matter and themes, whatever spectacle they offer, is not going to be legitimate. For these folks, the best option for an evening does not involve unknowns. So they’re not there, whatever you do.
So, your audience: they’re not at home, and they’re not at the large concert venues in your city.
Where might they be?
If they’re in Chicago, they might be at the Windy City Rollers.
If they’re in Portland, they might be at Le Pigeon.
If they’re in Washington, D.C., they might be at Againn.
If they’re in New York City, they might be at Happy Ending.
The audiences at these shows are the ones who leave their house, and who choose a live, local experience. Celebrities, on a screen or before thousands of fans, aren’t taking away audiences from theater. Instead, theater is only one slim option in the wider realm of local, live, dramatic performance.
It used to be that a date might involve a restaurant and a play. Now, often, the restaurant is the play: a space that rewards both conversation and sensory focus; a space in which another’s talent is experienced directly and first-hand, in a command performance; and a space in which the performance does not exist before or after the moment the audience experiences it. It’s no coincidence that seeing the kitchen—the backstage—at Le Pigeon is a central part of the experience.
A good play and a good performance venue can hold its own with any of these. But whether it is a season ticket for the Windy City Rollers, a $70 prix-fixe dinner, or a free variety show, or a Taizé service, these live performances are setting the standards—for value as well as theatrical experience—for our missing audience (young and old; curious, smart, open-minded, and getting their fulfillment outside the nest), whether we know it or not.
Latest posts by Eric Ziegenhagen (see all)
- The Conversation After The Show - 25 January 2012
- Reviews and Pull Quotes: Telling The Truth and Courting The Indifferent - 26 June 2011
- Notes on the New Kushner (2009–2011) - 14 April 2011