<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pull Quotes: Chase me.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2amtheatre.com/2010/06/24/pull-quotes-chase-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2amtheatre.com/2010/06/24/pull-quotes-chase-me/</link>
	<description>thinking outside the black box...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Colony</title>
		<link>http://www.2amtheatre.com/2010/06/24/pull-quotes-chase-me/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Colony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2amtheatre.com/?p=1095#comment-345</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess it makes sense for me to weigh in on this because I can at least speak from personal experience. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I completely understand the argument of bad theater-to-audience behavior. This was a major fear of mine when we decided to go forward with our campaign. We decided to wait until the last week of voting so that we only had to pursue our supporters for 7 days rather than an entire month. We also ran the campaign by telling our supporters exactly what the money would go towards and what the short and long-term affects would be on the company. So our supporters actually got very excited about the possibility of helping us win - and did an incredible amount of work rallying further support. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will say - we saw very little gain from generic &quot;vote for us&quot; postings. They just don&#039;t work. Especially with as much activity as comes across on Facebook already - your plea has to matter to someone for them to spend the time. We found the greatest success by calling individuals directly. We actually threw a big phone-bank party and had everyone in the company and any available supporters bring laptops and phones and we basically worked together to personally reach out to as many voters as possible. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So yes - Chasegiving can be hugely obnoxious - or you can turn it into a social strategy to a) reach out and start a conversation with your supporters, b) rally your base around a common goal, and c) make your supporters feel successful in helping you win. I&#039;ve been talking to a lot of business leaders lately about how ironic it is that people have stripped the &quot;social&quot; aspect our of Social Media. Facebook isn&#039;t a tool to force-feed information. It&#039;s a tool for beginning, encouraging and extending conversations. But I guess programs like Chasegiving sort of bring out the worst behavior in people. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For a company our size, that was barely eligible for traditional grants - Chasegiving was a HUGE win for us. It literally made our entire 2nd season possible without the &quot;HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR THIS?!?!?!&quot; stress that accompanies so many productions. It allowed us to do a complete rebranding of the company. It allowed us to significantly improve our marketing and PR resources. It made it possible for us to improve our admittedly basement-budget level of production elements. And it&#039;s made it possible for us to send Calls to Blood to FringeNYC. Those are no small things. And while it&#039;s tempting to fall into the &quot;is it moral&quot; debate about Chasegiving - I feel good about how we&#039;ve used the money, how it made our supporters feel, and how much of a confidence-boost it gave everyone involved in TNC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess it makes sense for me to weigh in on this because I can at least speak from personal experience. </p>
<p>I completely understand the argument of bad theater-to-audience behavior. This was a major fear of mine when we decided to go forward with our campaign. We decided to wait until the last week of voting so that we only had to pursue our supporters for 7 days rather than an entire month. We also ran the campaign by telling our supporters exactly what the money would go towards and what the short and long-term affects would be on the company. So our supporters actually got very excited about the possibility of helping us win &#8211; and did an incredible amount of work rallying further support. </p>
<p>I will say &#8211; we saw very little gain from generic &#8220;vote for us&#8221; postings. They just don&#39;t work. Especially with as much activity as comes across on Facebook already &#8211; your plea has to matter to someone for them to spend the time. We found the greatest success by calling individuals directly. We actually threw a big phone-bank party and had everyone in the company and any available supporters bring laptops and phones and we basically worked together to personally reach out to as many voters as possible. </p>
<p>So yes &#8211; Chasegiving can be hugely obnoxious &#8211; or you can turn it into a social strategy to a) reach out and start a conversation with your supporters, b) rally your base around a common goal, and c) make your supporters feel successful in helping you win. I&#39;ve been talking to a lot of business leaders lately about how ironic it is that people have stripped the &#8220;social&#8221; aspect our of Social Media. Facebook isn&#39;t a tool to force-feed information. It&#39;s a tool for beginning, encouraging and extending conversations. But I guess programs like Chasegiving sort of bring out the worst behavior in people. </p>
<p>For a company our size, that was barely eligible for traditional grants &#8211; Chasegiving was a HUGE win for us. It literally made our entire 2nd season possible without the &#8220;HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR THIS?!?!?!&#8221; stress that accompanies so many productions. It allowed us to do a complete rebranding of the company. It allowed us to significantly improve our marketing and PR resources. It made it possible for us to improve our admittedly basement-budget level of production elements. And it&#39;s made it possible for us to send Calls to Blood to FringeNYC. Those are no small things. And while it&#39;s tempting to fall into the &#8220;is it moral&#8221; debate about Chasegiving &#8211; I feel good about how we&#39;ve used the money, how it made our supporters feel, and how much of a confidence-boost it gave everyone involved in TNC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Theatre Development Director</title>
		<link>http://www.2amtheatre.com/2010/06/24/pull-quotes-chase-me/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>A Theatre Development Director</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2amtheatre.com/?p=1095#comment-344</guid>
		<description>I agree that the Chase Community Giving program is a marketing stunt and that those organizations with strong social networking come out the winners.  When they first launched this last year, I took a look at some of the winners.  About half the organizations that won this lottery seemed to be good organizations that did good work.  But others were dubious.  Some had only been in an existence for a couple of years.  Others had low or poor ratings on Guidestar or Charity Navigator.  There were three drum and bugle organizations that won and about five very small charities that assist specifically with orphaned children in China.  That clearly demonstrated the social networking aspect of this program.  Awards weren&#039;t based on good work, but rather popularity.  And Chase got the biggest bang for their buck.  Free advertising all over Facebook as fans of thousands of organizations voted for their favorite non-profit.  I implored my friends not to participate in this scheme.  This was a marketing program, not a philanthropic program.  Oh, and to think that non-profits poured energy into getting people to vote for them, only to come out with no funding.  Instead, they should have put the little resources they have into fundraising intiatives that work, not on promoting the marketing of a bank in the hopes of winning big.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Chase Community Giving program is a marketing stunt and that those organizations with strong social networking come out the winners.  When they first launched this last year, I took a look at some of the winners.  About half the organizations that won this lottery seemed to be good organizations that did good work.  But others were dubious.  Some had only been in an existence for a couple of years.  Others had low or poor ratings on Guidestar or Charity Navigator.  There were three drum and bugle organizations that won and about five very small charities that assist specifically with orphaned children in China.  That clearly demonstrated the social networking aspect of this program.  Awards weren&#39;t based on good work, but rather popularity.  And Chase got the biggest bang for their buck.  Free advertising all over Facebook as fans of thousands of organizations voted for their favorite non-profit.  I implored my friends not to participate in this scheme.  This was a marketing program, not a philanthropic program.  Oh, and to think that non-profits poured energy into getting people to vote for them, only to come out with no funding.  Instead, they should have put the little resources they have into fundraising intiatives that work, not on promoting the marketing of a bank in the hopes of winning big.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rb180</title>
		<link>http://www.2amtheatre.com/2010/06/24/pull-quotes-chase-me/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>rb180</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2amtheatre.com/?p=1095#comment-342</guid>
		<description>I think the Chase program is a huge publicity stunt, and the number one problem with it is that it rewards organizations that have the most social networking clout - not necessarily quality programs, worthy programs. If an organization has the means (staff, financial) to spend on their Facebook fan page that&#039;s great, but what about all of the other not for profits that have to spend most of their time and money actually running their programs? It only rewards those with technical clout, not those with funding-worthy activities. I work for an organization that used to apply every year to Chase, and received funding based on the merits of our program. That funding was abruptly taken away without warning, and now goes towards organizations with thousands of Facebook friends. As a result, our program suffered.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Chase program is a huge publicity stunt, and the number one problem with it is that it rewards organizations that have the most social networking clout &#8211; not necessarily quality programs, worthy programs. If an organization has the means (staff, financial) to spend on their Facebook fan page that&#39;s great, but what about all of the other not for profits that have to spend most of their time and money actually running their programs? It only rewards those with technical clout, not those with funding-worthy activities. I work for an organization that used to apply every year to Chase, and received funding based on the merits of our program. That funding was abruptly taken away without warning, and now goes towards organizations with thousands of Facebook friends. As a result, our program suffered.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.2amtheatre.com/2010/06/24/pull-quotes-chase-me/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2amtheatre.com/?p=1095#comment-333</guid>
		<description>And worlds collide.  Mr. Keenan and I are in complete agreement on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And worlds collide.  Mr. Keenan and I are in complete agreement on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

